Tesco/Homebase Inquiry Hearings Delayed Until September

Heritage expert witness not available until that time

The inquiry is now being held remotely. Picture: OWGRA/YouTube


Council Lawyers Mount Robust Defence at Tesco/Homebase Inquiry

Demo Planned Ahead of Tesco/Homebase Public Inquiry

Council Plans to Spend £200,000 on Tesco/Homebase Legal Costs

Public Inquiry To Be Held into Tesco/Homebase Plan

Anti-Tesco/Homebase Development Petition Taken To Michael Gove

Minister Sacked on Day of Tesco/Homebase Protest

Dismay at Mayor's Green Light for Tesco/Homebase Scheme

Residents' Group Says Manhattan is Coming To Osterley

Sign up for our Brentford newsletter

Comment on this story on the

The sessions of the public inquiry into the Tesco/Homebase development that were to look into the heritage issues raised by the scheme will now not take place until September.

This is because an expert witness that was due to give testimony is not available. Therefore sessions that were due to take place this week will now be held provisionally on 26-28 September and closing statements will be presented on Friday, 30 September.

Other sessions in the inquiry are continuing this week but the heritage sessions which were due to take place from 21-23 March did not take place. Roundtable discussions about public transport, roads, infrastructure, environmental aspects, character and appearance, housing mix and living conditions have continued. Next week a number of site visits are taking place.

The updated inquiry timetable is available online.

The Osterley and Wyke Green Residents’ Association (OWGRA) says it feels that the hearings have gone well for them so far in what it describes as a ‘David vs Goliath’ contest with opponents of the scheme not having the legal resources available to its supporters.

On the fourth day of the hearing last Friday (18 March) OWGRA presented its only expert witness, Mike Spence, an independent consultant in photo visualisation (PV).

He told the inquiry that it appeared that much the PV submitted by the applicant was produced with inappropriate lenses, tripod and positioning, without geographic software, and not following current guidance. He had produced his own 3D aerial imagery which showed the dramatic extent of the development. He dismissed the assertion in the Townscape Visual Impact Assessment (TVIA) that, apart from during construction, any impacts would be beneficial or neutral and focused on the so-called ‘Canaletto View’ – the view of Syon House from across the river at Kew – showing that the views submitted by the applicant minimised the mass of the development rising above the roof line of the House. He defended this assertion when it was queried by the QC representing the applicant saying that there was limited or no evidence regarding the applicant’s methodology. The applicant’s two PV consultants were not present at the Inquiry to defend their technical methodology.

Expert witness argued that applicant's visualisations were inadequate. Picture: OWGRA

A discussion of the trees planted in Syon Park followed concerning the extent to which they would screen views of the development.

If the inquiry decides in their favour the applications would see 16 tower blocks built with the tallest 17 storeys high. These would include over 2,000 flats and are expected to increase the population of the area by over 6,000.

There were over 800 objection received to the proposals and over 4,000 people signed a petition asking the Mayor to block the application which he declined to do.

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.


March 25, 2022

Bookmark and Share